CO afl-cio header

 

Dear CO Labor Leaders,

 

Check out this great blog recently published on "Work for Less" at www.squarestate.net. The message is very strong and the piece is well-written.

 

Whenever something appears on "Work for Less" in the press, we want you to be the first to know. We'll be sending you these sorts of stories as "breaking news" from time to time.

 

In solidarity,

 

Mike Cerbo

Executive Director, CO AFL-CIO

___________________________________________________________________

Outsiders Pushing Anti-labor 'Right to Work' Amendment in CO

 

http://squarestate.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=5231

 

 

As some of us well know, there is another attempt this year by anti worker forces to destroy unions in CO.  Once again, Republicans and anti-union business owners are trying to destroy the benefits union members have fought hard to achieve by passing a 'Right to Work' amendment.

 

Such an amendment would allow non-union workers to get the benefits and improved working conditions won by labor unions without paying union dues. In other words, it allows them to freeload off the unions.  If that happens, it will not be long before there will not be any unions or they will be so weak they will be ineffectual.

 

'Right to work' also dictates the relationship between employer and employee, rather than letting them determine by themselves what that relationship should be.  This is how a free market works, and a right to work actually constricts employer and employee options, the exact opposite of what it claims to do.

 

So who is the main catalyst for this 'right to work' movement in CO? Apparently some out of state special interest groups.  Nothing quite like having out of state special interests come into your state to tell you how to run your economy.  In fact, recently Dimitri Kesari, the Executive Director of the National Right to Work Committee, testified before the Colorado Congress on behalf of this regressive amendment.  This is familiar territory for Kesari.  He was in Michigan recently pushing his anti-worker agenda there too.

 

Who spoke for the rights of working Americans?  A local Coloradoan firefighter. 

 

So to make their case, anti-union forces brought in some lobbyists from outside the state, while those supporting working Coloradoans used someone much more familiar with the CO economy and working conditions, a local firefighter.

 

<>Look, out of state experts and advocates testify before the Colorado Congress all the time for both sides.    But using solely non-Coloradoans to advance their anti-worker agenda certainly smacks of a hostile takeover by national 'right to work' organizations.  There certainly does not seem to be a ground swell of public support for crushing unions in CO.  I hear no local grassroots outcry against union shops.  The motivation for this draconian amendment seem to be nothing more than a national special interest group deciding Colorado is the next target in their quest to make the entire country inhospitable for unions.

 

<>I, for one, do not think that is a great starting point for any legislation. Rather than alter Colorado's Constitution to appease the ideology of a Washington special interest group, we should work to promote good jobs and affordable health care for all.  Those are issues Coloradoans care about, not dictating what kind of relationship workers should have with their bosses. 

 

Let Coloradoans decide the laws they need, not national special interest groups.

-BACK -
web: opeiu #5, afl-cio/lll